Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8613971
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T05:00:34+00:00 2026-06-12T05:00:34+00:00

Let’s say I have an XML something like this: <root xmlns=default xmlns:add=additional> <element foo=fromDefault

  • 0

Let’s say I have an XML something like this:

<root xmlns="default" xmlns:add="additional">
    <element foo="fromDefault" />
    <add:element foo="fromDefault" add:bar="fromAdditional" />
</root>

What I would like to do is to merge the two element definitions to avoid duplications, something like this:

<root xmlns="default" xmlns:add="additional">
    <element foo="fromDefault" add:bar="fromAdditional" />
</root>

But I’m not even sure if this is possible.

I have the feeling it might be doable because we use some similar notations for the root elements like:

<root xmlns:xsi="..."
         xsi:schemaLocation="...">

Unfortunately I wasn’t able to find any docs/references/tutorials/anything about this issue, could someone help me clarify if what I would like to do is possible (or not) and share some links with me?

Thanks in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T05:00:35+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 5:00 am

    I think that you are looking for something like this:

    additional.xsd

    <xs:schema 
      targetNamespace="additional"
      elementFormDefault="qualified"
      xmlns="additional"
      xmlns:mstns="http://tempuri.org/XMLSchema.xsd"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    
      <xs:attribute name="bar" type="xs:string"/>
    
    </xs:schema>
    

    default.xsd

    <xs:schema 
      targetNamespace="default"
      elementFormDefault="qualified"
      xmlns="default"
      xmlns:mstns="http://tempuri.org/XMLSchema.xsd"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      xmlns:add="additional">
    
      <xs:import namespace="additional" schemaLocation="additional.xsd"/>
    
      <xs:element name="root">
        <xs:complexType>
          <xs:sequence>
            <xs:element name="element" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
              <xs:complexType>
                <xs:attribute name="foo" type="xs:string"/>
                <xs:attribute ref="add:bar"/>
              </xs:complexType>
            </xs:element>
          </xs:sequence>
        </xs:complexType>
      </xs:element>
    
    </xs:schema>
    

    The first schema defines only the ‘additional’ stuff (in the example just an attribute) and the second schema imports it and defines everything else, referencing the additional stuff where needed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say that I have 2 lines like this. Some Label: First element Second
Let's say I have a sortable list like this: $(.song-list).sortable({ handle : '.pos_handle', axis
Let's say I have a string like this: var str = /abcd/efgh/ijkl/xxx-1/xxx-2; How do
Let's say I have a text file composed like this ##### typeofthread1 ##### typeofthread2
Let's suppose I have an XML file like this: <?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?> <MIDIFile> <Event>
Let's say you have an array like this: array ( ['one'] => array (
Let's say you have a string that looks like this: token1 token2 tok3 And
Let's say on a page I have alot of this repeated: <div class=entry> <h4>Magic:</h4>
Let's say I can call a method like this: core::get() . What is the
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.