Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4118924
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T23:01:27+00:00 2026-05-20T23:01:27+00:00

Let’s say I have: data MyType myToDouble :: MyType -> Double Let’s say I

  • 0

Let’s say I have:

data MyType
myToDouble :: MyType -> Double

Let’s say I want MyType to be an instance of Num or Real or something that Double is already an instance of.

Is there a simple way to accomplish that without having to manually writing out all the methods in Num/Real for it?

So… is there some way of just saying:

instance Real MyType by way of myToDouble
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T23:01:28+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:01 pm

    Definitely not; Real depends on Num, and Num has methods which return a (or more accurately, are covariant in a). How are you going to implement:

    (+) :: MyType -> MyType -> MyType
    

    given just MyType and myToDouble?

    Now maybe you already have all the other instances and are just wondering about Real. Well, the only method Real has is of its own toRational, so:

    instance Real MyType where
        toRational = toRational . myToDouble
    

    As for your more general question: unfortunately not. If you have a class whose methods are all contravariant (only take as arguments) in the type variable, then you should be able to automatically define a typeclass on a projection like this. But Haskell has no mechanism to do so. (You could write one yourself using Template Haskell).

    You can “forward” a newtype’s instances to its underlying type using GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving. Eg.

    {-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}
    
    newtype MyType = MyType Double
        deriving (Eq,Ord,Show,Num,Real)
    

    But you can’t use any old isomorphism. It’s a shame.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a table that looks something like this: ------------------------------- id|column2|column3 |column4
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,
Let's say that I have an arbitrary string like `A man + a plan
Let's say I have two files.. I want to compare them side-by-side and see
Let's say i have an android device that has some extra buttons on it,
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let me try to explain what I need. I have a server that is
Let's say we have a simple function defined in a pseudo language. List<Numbers> SortNumbers(List<Numbers>

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.