Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 385729
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T15:30:29+00:00 2026-05-12T15:30:29+00:00

Let’s say I have foreach(int x in xs[]) // xs is an array of

  • 0

Let’s say I have

foreach(int x in xs[]) // xs is an array of int
{
x++;
}

Each time through the foreach is independent of the others.
Is there a quick way to instruct the CLR to do each on a seperate thread or speed it up by natively parallelising it?

Maybe it already knows to do this.

I know you I could create threads and start them but it would be swell if there was an attribute or flag I could set that would take care of it for me.

My actual code is more complex but each iteration through the foreach is also free of effect between iterations.

something like

[parallelize maxThreads=5]
foreach(int x in xs[]) // xs is an array of int
{
x++;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T15:30:29+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 3:30 pm

    You could try a Parallel.For from the Task Parallel Library. This could work really well if you get the granularity right. See the following article for more details:

    Optimize Managed Code For Multi-Core Machines
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163340.aspx

    The Task Parallel Library for .NET 3.5 SP1 can be downloaded from this page. Here is a direct link.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 242k
  • Answers 242k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Short answer is GWT can call into a program written… May 13, 2026 at 7:37 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer setInterval(onTimerTick, 33); // 33 milliseconds = ~ 30 frames per… May 13, 2026 at 7:37 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Apart from using a JDK dynamic proxy, which works only… May 13, 2026 at 7:37 am

Related Questions

I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
Let's say you create a wizard in an HTML form. One button goes back,
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let me try to explain what I need. I have a server that is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.