Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9268667
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T14:54:57+00:00 2026-06-18T14:54:57+00:00

Let’s say I have the following code block: int version; String content; synchronized (foo)

  • 0

Let’s say I have the following code block:

int    version;
String content;
synchronized (foo) {
    version = foo.getVersion();
    content = foo.getContent();
}
// Do something with version and content

Its purpose is to grab a thread-safe consistent view of the version and content of some object foo.

Is there a way to write it more concisely to look more like this?

synchronized (foo) {
    int    version = foo.getVersion();
    String content = foo.getContent();
}
// Do something with version and content

The problem is that in this version the variables are defined in the scope of the (synchronized) curly braces and can therefore not be accessed outside of the block. So, the question is: Is there some way to mark these curly braces as not defining a new scope block or marking the variables as belonging to the parent scope without having to declare them there?

(Note: I do not want to simply pull the // Do something with version and content into the synchronized block.)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T14:54:59+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 2:54 pm

    Simply put … no. Scoped variables are only available in the scope they are declared. Thats their whole point. This is described in section 14.4.2 of the Java Language Specification:

    The scope of a local variable declaration in a block (§14.2) is the
    rest of the block in which the declaration appears, starting with its
    own initializer (§14.4) and including any further declarators to the
    right in the local variable declaration statement.

    Your variables need to be declared in the scope they are to be used in (or higher, but definitely not lower).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have the function #include <string> std::string const foo() { std::string s
let's say.. I have the following java bean. Case1: (Student Bean) Integer id; String
Let's say I have a string like this: var str = /abcd/efgh/ijkl/xxx-1/xxx-2; How do
Let's say for a moment that I have the following module in python: class
Let's say I have the following table: Table: RelationshipType ============================================================ | ID (PK) |
Let's say I have a file foo.py, and within the file I want to
Let's say I have a domain object with the following field: private Map<StatType, Double>
Let's say that I have classes like this: public class Parent { public int
Let's say I have 2 functions: void function1(int *ptr) { printf(%d, *ptr); } and
Let's say I have the following two lists of tuples myList = [(1, 7),

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.