Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 108181
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T01:52:17+00:00 2026-05-11T01:52:17+00:00

Lets say I have the following: public class MyObject { [Bindable] public var foo:int

  • 0

Lets say I have the following:

public class MyObject {  [Bindable] public var foo:int = 3;   }  ...  [Bindable] var _obj:MyObject = null; 

What’s the best way to bind foo so that this binding is updated when _obj is set to a new instance?

I’ve tried:

<mx:Label text='{_obj&amp;&amp;_obj.foo}'/> 

But it isn’t pretty. Can I express this somehow using

What do the SO::Flex community think?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T01:52:17+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:52 am

    Binding doesn’t depend on properties; you can get the benefits of binding with either fields or properties.

    It looks like you might’ve left something out, maybe? The following MXML and AS, for example, work to bind on both a field and a property, once the class and its instance are marked Bindable:

    package {     [Bindable]     public class MyFoo     {         public var myPublicField:int;         private var _myPrivateField:int;          public function MyFoo()         {             myPublicField = 0;             myPublicProperty = 0;         }          public function get myPublicProperty():int         {             return _myPrivateField;         }          public function set myPublicProperty(value:int):void         {             _myPrivateField = value;         }     } }  <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <mx:Application xmlns:mx='http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml' layout='absolute'>      <mx:Script>         <![CDATA[              [Bindable]             private var myFoo:MyFoo;              private function increment():void             {                 if (!myFoo)                     myFoo = new MyFoo();                  myFoo.myPublicField += 1;                 myFoo.myPublicProperty += 1;             }              private function replace():void             {                 myFoo = new MyFoo();             }          ]]>     </mx:Script>      <mx:VBox>         <mx:HBox>             <mx:Label text='Field:' />             <mx:Text text='{myFoo.myPublicField}' />         </mx:HBox>         <mx:HBox>             <mx:Label text='Property:' />             <mx:Text text='{myFoo.myPublicProperty}' />          </mx:HBox>         <mx:Button label='Increment Both Counts' click='increment()' />         <mx:Button label='Replace with New Foo' click='replace()' />     </mx:VBox>  </mx:Application> 

    Incidentally, the effect would be the same if you marked the field and the property Bindable separately, rather than marking the class, which is just shorthand for the same thing. Also note myFoo starts out null by default, as in your sample code (i.e., the ‘ = null’ assignment is redundant).

    Does this example help? If not, leave a comment and I’ll check back. Hope it does!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Lets say i have following class public class abc { int id; string name;
Lets say I have the following class: public class Provider { ... public sealed
Lets say a have the following Model public class FirstModel { public List<SecondModel> SecondModels
Lets say that I have the following code: public class Shelter<A extends Animal, B
Lets say I have a library, version 1.0.0, with the following contents: public class
Let's say I have a class public class MyObject { public int SimpleInt {
Lets say I have the following code: public class Base { // Some stuff
Lets say I have the following code: public class Collection implements CollectionInterface{ ElementInterface[] elementArray
lets say I have the following public class A { private string _someField; public
Lets say I have class Person { public Person(int age, string name) { Age

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.