Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 512625
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:20:20+00:00 2026-05-13T07:20:20+00:00

Let’s say I have this class: public abstract class CustomerCollectionBase : Collection<Customer>{} One of

  • 0

Let’s say I have this class:

public abstract class CustomerCollectionBase : Collection<Customer>{}

One of my classes under test accepts CustomerCollectionBase instance (it will be some subclass). In the method under test, this collection is enumerated via for loop and results are examined and processed.
like follows:

for (int i=0;i<_customers.Count; i++){
 //process customer
}

Is it possible to stub this collection with Moq so I could pass stub as a dependency to my class-under-test’s constructor?

Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:20:20+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:20 am

    Technically, this would be possible, but difficult, since the only overridable members of Collection<T> are protected.

    It would be much easier to just pass a concrete collection instead, unless you absolutely must perform some interaction-based testing on the collection itself.

    However, if you must do this with Moq, you will first need to add the following using directive to your test code:

    using Moq.Protected;
    

    You can now use the Protected() methods to setup the mock to with the appropriate protected virtual methods of CustomerCollectionBase.

    See this blog post for more information on how to Mock protected members with Moq.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.