Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 744575
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T08:59:38+00:00 2026-05-14T08:59:38+00:00

Let’s say I have this: float i = 1.5 in binary, this float is

  • 0

Let’s say I have this:

float i = 1.5

in binary, this float is represented as:

0 01111111 10000000000000000000000

I broke up the binary to represent the ‘signed’, ‘exponent’ and ‘fraction’ chunks.

What I don’t understand is how this represents 1.5.

The exponent is 0 once you subtract the bias (127 – 127), and the fraction part with the implicit leading one is 1.1.

How does 1.1 scaled by nothing = 1.5???

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T08:59:38+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:59 am

    Think first in terms of decimal (base 10): 643.72 is:

    • (6 * 102) +
    • (4 * 101) +
    • (3 * 100) +
    • (7 * 10-1) +
    • (2 * 10-2)

    or 600 + 40 + 3 + 7/10 + 2/100.

    That’s because n0 is always 1, n-1 is the same as 1/n (for a specific case) and n-m is identical to 1/nm (for more general case).

    Similarly, the binary number 1.1 is:

    • (1 * 20) +
    • (1 * 2-1)

    with 20 being one and 2-1 being one-half.

    In decimal, the numbers to the left of the decimal point have multipliers 1, 10, 100 and so on heading left from the decimal point, and 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000 heading right (i.e., 102, 101, 100, decimal point, 10-1, 10-2, …).

    In base-2, the numbers to the left of the binary point have multipliers 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and so on heading left. The numbers to the right have multipliers 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and so on heading right.

    So, for example, the binary number:

    101.00101
    | |   | |
    | |   | +- 1/32
    | |   +---  1/8
    | +-------    1
    +---------    4
    

    is equivalent to:

    4 + 1 + 1/8 + 1/32
    

    or:

        5
    5  --
       32
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 432k
  • Answers 432k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes, you need the remote debugging feature of Visual Studio.… May 15, 2026 at 2:28 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could actually use the function ISMEMBER to get an… May 15, 2026 at 2:28 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'd suggest you take an approach like what the Stocktrader… May 15, 2026 at 2:28 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.