Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 757747
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T15:23:57+00:00 2026-05-14T15:23:57+00:00

Let’s say I have three 32-bit floating point values, a , b , and

  • 0

Let’s say I have three 32-bit floating point values, a, b, and c, such that (a + b) + c != a + (b + c). Is there a summation algorithm, perhaps similar to Kahan summation, that guarantees that these values can be summed in any order and always arrive at the exact same (fairly accurate) total? I’m looking for the general case (i.e. not a solution that only deals with 3 numbers).

Is arbitrary precision arithmetic the only way to go? I’m dealing with very large data sets, so I’d like to avoid the overhead of using arbitrary precision arithmetic if possible.

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T15:23:58+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:23 pm

    There’s an interesting ‘full-precision-summation’ algorithm here, which guarantees that the final sum is independent of the order of the summands (recipe given in Python; but it shouldn’t be too difficult to translate to other languages). Note that the recipe as given in that link isn’t perfectly correct: the main accumulation loop is fine, but in the final step that converts the list of accumulated partial sums to a single floating-point result (the very last line of the msum recipe), one needs to be a little bit more careful than simply summing the partial sums in order to get a correctly-rounded result. See the comments below the recipe, and Python’s implementation (linked below) for a way to fix this.

    It does use a form of arbitrary-precision arithmetic to hold partial sums (the intermediate sums are represented as ‘non-overlapping’ sums of doubles), but may nevertheless be fast enough, especially when all the inputs are of roughly the same magnitude. And it always gives a correctly rounded result, so accuracy is as good as you could hope for and the final sum is independent of the order of the summands. It’s based on this paper (Adaptive Precision Floating-Point Arithmetic and Fast Robust Geometric Predicates) by Jonathan Shewchuk.

    Python uses this algorithm for its implementation of math.fsum, which does correctly-rounded order-independent summation; you can see the C implementation that Python uses here— look for the math_fsum function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let me explain best with an example. Say you have node class that can
Let's say that I have a SQLite database that I create in a separate
Let's say I have multiple requirements for a password. The first is that the
Let's say that I have a date in R and it's formatted as follows.
Let's say you have a method that expects a numerical value as an argument.
Let's say I have a bunch of links that share a click event: <a
Let's say that I have a set of relations that looks like this: relations
let's say that we have models, A, B, and C A is 1:N to
Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.