Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 787807
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T21:15:52+00:00 2026-05-14T21:15:52+00:00

Lets say I have two shared variables – a and b – that are

  • 0

Lets say I have two shared variables – a and b – that are related to each other. When multiple applications share these shared variables, access to them needs to be an atomic operation, otherwise the relation may break. So to ensure mutual exclusion, I’ll put their modification under a critical section protected by lock.

critical_code
{
    P(mutex)
    a := something
    b := something
    V(mutex)
}

Lets say my hardware/OS/compiler supports atomic variables. Then I modified my above code as follows.

code
{
    atomic a := something
    atomic b := something
}

Can this code ensure mutual exclusion, when accessed by multiple applications?

Sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T21:15:53+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:15 pm

    No, you still need a critical section. While update of each variable is atomic, this still doesn’t warrant against situations when one process has only midified one variable but the other is already reading the inconsistent state.

    You only rely on atomic variables when it’s enough to know that every one write and every one read is atomic – i.e. you’re already happy if you know that when one process is updating the variable the other will not read a partially changed variable.

    So atomic variable is atomic per one variable, not per set of variables.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 390k
  • Answers 390k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Cause was <pathelement location="./bin" />. This bin folder was recompiled… May 15, 2026 at 1:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I can't answer completely beacuse I've never needed to do… May 15, 2026 at 1:05 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer My most used macro bound to Ctrl-; ";" delete-previous caret-end-line… May 15, 2026 at 1:05 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.