Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 954389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T00:12:34+00:00 2026-05-16T00:12:34+00:00

Let’s say I’ve got a Java object that’s got among others the following methods:

  • 0

Let’s say I’ve got a Java object that’s got among others the following methods:

public String getField1();
public String getField2();
public String getField3();
public String getField4();
public String getField5();

Is there a way to iterate through these methods and call ’em like the following code?

String fields = "";
for(int i = 1; i <= 5; i ++){
   fields += object.(getField+i) + " | ";
}

Thank you for your upcoming ideas.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T00:12:35+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:12 am

    There is a way using reflection:

    try{
      Method m= object.getClass().getMethod("getField"+String.valueOf(i), new Class[]{});
      fields+=(String)m.invoke(object);
    }catch(...){...}
    

    However:
    This business all smells of bad coding practice!
    Can’t you rewrite all the getFieldN() methods like this?

    String getField(int fieldNum)
    

    You are asking for trouble by creating numbered methods. Remember that reflection is slow and should only be used when String-based method calls are absolutely essential to the flow of your program. I sometimes use this technique for user-defined scripting languages where you have to get a method by name. That isn’t the case at all here, your calls are integer-indexed. You should therefore keep the integer as a parameter.

    If this is legacy code and you are absolutely unable to change this bad coding, then you might be better off creating a new method getMethod(int) as above to wrap the existing methods, that just delegates to the numbered getMethodN() methods.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 500k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not pretty but it works: rm -R $(ls… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. Override the base1 and base2 methods in Derived to… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can't. Unfortunately, UIEvent doesn't expose any public way… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Let's say that I have an arbitrary string like `A man + a plan
Let's say I have a class like this: public class Person { private String
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let's say I'm writing a PHP (>= 5.0) class that's meant to be a
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,
Let's say that I'm currently designing an application where I will need to use
Let's say I have this: public DefaultListModel model = new DefaultListModel(); how do i
Let's say I have a table that looks something like this: ------------------------------- id|column2|column3 |column4
Let's say you create a wizard in an HTML form. One button goes back,
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.