Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8816719
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T04:40:58+00:00 2026-06-14T04:40:58+00:00

Lets say I’ve got something like the following: class A { virtual void g()

  • 0

Lets say I’ve got something like the following:

class A { virtual void g() = 0 }

class B : public A { virtual void g() { ... } }
class C : public A { virtual void g() { ... } }

... f(bool x)
{
  if (x) { return B(); } else { return C(); }
}

bool get_boolean();

int main()
{
  bool b = get_boolean();
  ... x = f(b);
  x.g();
}

Is there anyway to do something like the above without calls to new, i.e. solely on the stack?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T04:41:00+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 4:41 am

    In function f objects B() or C() are both temporary, so you can only return them from f by value.

    Maybe boost::variant is for you. Then you don’t even need to have the method virtual or derive from a common base class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Lets say I have the following class public class Test { public int prop1
Lets say we have the following code class Image { public: Image(const std::string &
Lets say I have a class A that is fairly simple like this -
Lets say I got the extension which does something with the enum and then
Lets say that I have this code moveDirectory.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener(){ public void onClick(View v) {
Lets say I have a div like this: <div id=test class=sourcecode> Some String </div>
Lets say we have the following code: class C t where g :: t
Lets say I have something like this in my database (abstract) MyTable { Long
Lets say I have the following code: abstract class Animal case class Dog(name:String) extends
Lets say that I have one object like: class First { int key; }

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.