Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6365495
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T00:18:03+00:00 2026-05-25T00:18:03+00:00

Let’s say that I want to generate a large data frame from scratch. Using

  • 0

Let’s say that I want to generate a large data frame from scratch.

Using the data.frame function is how I would generally create data frames.
However, df’s like the following are extremely error prone and inefficient.

So is there a more efficient way of creating the following data frame.

df <- data.frame(GOOGLE_CAMPAIGN=c(rep("Google - Medicare - US", 928), rep("MedicareBranded", 2983),
                                   rep("Medigap", 805), rep("Medigap Branded", 1914),
                                   rep("Medicare Typos", 1353), rep("Medigap Typos", 635),
                                   rep("Phone - MedicareGeneral", 585),
                                   rep("Phone - MedicareBranded", 2967),
                                   rep("Phone-Medigap", 812),
                                   rep("Auto Broad Match", 27),
                                   rep("Auto Exact Match", 80),
                                   rep("Auto Exact Match", 875)),                   
                 GOOGLE_AD_GROUP=c(rep("Medicare", 928), rep("MedicareBranded", 2983),
                                   rep("Medigap", 805), rep("Medigap Branded", 1914),
                                   rep("Medicare Typos", 1353), rep("Medigap Typos", 635),
                                   rep("Phone ads 1-Medicare Terms",585),
                                   rep("Ad Group #1", 2967), rep("Medigap-phone", 812),
                                   rep("Auto Insurance", 27),
                                   rep("Auto General", 80),
                                   rep("Auto Brand", 875)))

Yikes, that is some ‘bad’ code. How can I generate this ‘large’ data frame in a more efficient manner?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T00:18:03+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 12:18 am

    If your only source for that information is a piece of paper, then you probably won’t get much better than that, but you can at least consolidate all that into a single rep call for each column:

    #I'm going to cheat and not type out all those strings by hand
    x <- unique(df[,1])
    y <- unique(df[,2])
    
    #Vectors of the number of times for each    
    x1 <- c(928,2983,805,1914,1353,635,585,2967,812,27,955)
    y1 <- c(x1[-11],80,875)
    
    dd <- data.frame(GOOGLE_CAMPAIGN = rep(x, times = x1), 
                     GOOGLE_AD_GROUP = rep(y, times = y1))
    

    which should be the same:

    > all.equal(dd,df)
    [1] TRUE
    

    But if this information is already in a data structure in R somehow and you just need to transform it, that could possibly be even easier, but we’d need to know what that structure is.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say that I am using a 3rd party utility tool and I can't
Let's say I have the following function in C#: void ProcessResults() { using (FormProgress
Let's say I'm using cleanup() functions in Hadoop MapReduce. How would I add a
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let's say we have a simple function defined in a pseudo language. List<Numbers> SortNumbers(List<Numbers>
Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to
Let's say I'm writing a PHP (>= 5.0) class that's meant to be a
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,
Let's say i have an android device that has some extra buttons on it,
Let's say that I have an arbitrary string like `A man + a plan

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.