Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8424695
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T04:04:21+00:00 2026-06-10T04:04:21+00:00

Let’s say we have 3 users [User name=A], [User name=B], [User name=C] Is there

  • 0

Let’s say we have 3 users [User name="A"], [User name="B"], [User name="C"]

Is there a difference between (to check presence):

if User.where(name: "A").first

and

User.all.map(&:name).include? "A"

Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T04:04:23+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 4:04 am

    Using where only retrieves users who match the name, via SQL.

    Mapping loads all the users, builds an array of their names, and checks for ‘A’.

    For small numbers of users the difference in performance will be negligible, but both memory and time will be substantially impacted after a certain point, and where will be much better. Doing the work in the DB will be a better option than naively retrieving all data and doing it in Ruby.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have an facebook application running using the JS SDK. First user
Let's say I have a method in java, which looks up a user in
Let's say I have thousands of users and I want to make the passwords
Let's say I have window.open (without name parameter), scattered in my project and I
Let's say, if I need to assign an id to element with first name,
Let's say I have multiple requirements for a password. The first is that the
let's say I have a select list as follows: <select name='languages'> <option value='german'>German</option> <option
Let's say I got a Map<String, String> and I wanna remove all the entries
Let's say you have two different categories of users with different profiles: one for
Let's say I have a large amount of files, say 20GB worth, all encrypted

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.