Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8137161
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T11:00:36+00:00 2026-06-06T11:00:36+00:00

Let’s say you have a random number generator spitting out numbers between 1 and

  • 0

Let’s say you have a random number generator spitting out numbers between 1 and 100 000 000 and you want to store them in a database (MySQL) with the timestamp when they were generaeted. If a number that has previously been seen comes, it is discarded.

What would be the best algorithm to make this happen? SELECT then INSERT as necessary? Is there something more efficient?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T11:00:40+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 11:00 am
    1. You can go for a SEQUENCE:

      +

      • no relations are being locked, thus best performance;
      • no race conditions;
      • portable.

      -

      • it is possible to get “gaps” in the series of numbers.
    2. You can do a SELECT ... then INSERT ...:

      +

      • no gaps, you can also do some complicated math on your numbers.

      -

      • it’s possible to get another parallel session in the middle between SELECT and INSERT and end up with 2 equal numbers;
      • if there’s a UNIQUE constraint, then previos situation will lead to an exception;
      • to avoid such situation, you might go for an explicit table locks, but this will cause an immediate performance impact.
    3. You can choose INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, and by now it seems to be the best option (take a look at "INSERT IGNORE" vs "INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE"), at least in my view, with the only exception — not portable to other RDBMSes.

    P.S. This article is not related to MySQL, but it is worth reading it to get an overview of all the catches that can happen on your way.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let’s say I have a number like 0x448 . In binary this is 0100
Let's say I have the string: hello world; some random text; foo; How could
Let's say I have table with column 'URL' whrere I store urls like this
Let's say we have a simple function defined in a pseudo language. List<Numbers> SortNumbers(List<Numbers>
Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to
Let's say I don't have photoshop, but I want to make pattern files (.pat)
Let's say I have thousands of users and I want to make the passwords
Let's say I want to have some kind of a cache that did something
Let's say i have two tables in db: Car and Part. Car owns arbitrialy
Let's say I have a 12-bit Analog to Digital Converter (4096 bins). And let's

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.