Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3216396
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:17:22+00:00 2026-05-17T15:17:22+00:00

Lets say you have an array of size n with randomly generated elements and

  • 0

Lets say you have an array of size n with randomly generated elements and you want to use quicksort to sort the array. For large enough n (say 1,000,000), in order to speed up quicksort, it would make sense to stop recursing when the array gets small enough, and use insertion sort instead. In such an implementation, the base case for Quicksort is some value base > 1. What would the optimal base value to choose and why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:17:23+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:17 pm

    Think about the time complexity of quicksort (average and worst case) and the time complexity of other sort that might do better for small n.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have an array of arbitrary size holding single characters. I want to
Lets say that I have an array that I want to convert to a
Lets say I have an array like this: string [] Filelist = ... I
Lets say I have this array, int[] numbers = {1, 3, 4, 9, 2};
Lets say I have an array [0, 132, 432, 342, 234] What is the
Lets say I have the following array: Array ( [1284487200] => Array ( [title]
i have an array lets say x = 1 2 2 5 8 7
Lets say we have a posts collection, and embedded in posts is an array
Let's say I have an array, and I know I'm going to be doing
Let's say I have an array of lots of values (C++ syntax, sorry): vector<double>

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.