Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6843901
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T00:18:32+00:00 2026-05-27T00:18:32+00:00

Let’s say you have the following class: class A { private Foo foo =

  • 0

Let’s say you have the following class:

class A {
    private Foo foo = new Foo();
    Foo getFoo() {
        return foo; //foo.clone()?
    }
    void modifyFoo() {
        //modify this.foo
        //...
    }
}

I want to allow:

  • either multiple threads to call getFoo()
  • or one thread to call modifyFoo(),
  • once a thread wants to modify foo, no other new getFoo() calls arriving after that may be executed, until modification is done.

Are there classes already for this problem in Java or do I have to implement it? If I have to implement it, then how do I implement it ensure thread safety?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T00:18:33+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 12:18 am

    It sounds like what you’re looking for is a Read-Write lock, fortunately, java provides one, ReentrantReadWriteLock. You can use it as follows:

    class A {
        private ReentrantReadWriteLock lock = new ReentrantReadWriteLock();
        private Foo foo = new Foo();
        Foo getFoo() {
            lock.readLock().lock();
            try {
                Foo tmp = foo; //foo.clone()?
            } finally {
                lock.readLock().unlock();
            }
            return tmp;
        }
        void modifyFoo() {
            lock.writeLock().lock();
            try {
                //modify this.foo
                //...
            } finally {
                lock.writeLock().unlock();
            }
        }
    }
    

    This will allow any number of threads to call getFoo() simultaneously, but only one to call modifyFoo(). When modify foo is called, the thread will block until all read locks are released, then begin executing and prevent any new read locks from being acquired until it has finished. There are still concurrency issues to consider since the returned Foo can be modified by the code that calls getFoo, but this should provide the basic tool you need.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let's say I have a class like this: public class Person { private String
Let's say I have the following function in C#: void ProcessResults() { using (FormProgress
Let's say I have a link in a table like: <td class=ms-vb width=100%> <a
Let's say I have this: public DefaultListModel model = new DefaultListModel(); how do i
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
Let's say I have a property foo defined in my parent POM. Is it
Let's say I have the following code: Sub TestRangeLoop() Dim rng As Range Set
Let's say I have the following within my source code, and I want to
Let's say I just wrote the following class and I am starting to write

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.