Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1928684
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T07:00:33+00:00 2026-05-17T07:00:33+00:00

LINQ to objects has the incredibly useful Union , Intersect , and Except methods.

  • 0

LINQ to objects has the incredibly useful Union, Intersect, and Except methods. Sadly, there’s a client I’m doing work for and they are mandating .NET 2.0 so LINQ is not an option. I looked through the reflected code and it didn’t reverse well at all.

Is there a .NET 2.0 library or easy implementation of Union, Intersect, and Except?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T07:00:33+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:00 am

    Any reason not to use LINQBridge? Get your LINQ to Objects goodness while still targeting .NET 2.0 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I noticed that LINQ to Objects has a GroupBy method. In light of this,
When should I NOT use LINQ To Objects? The inverse of this question has
Is there a way to determine if a LINQ object has not yet been
I am using WCF to send some Linq objects across the wire. I want
I have a linq to objects query in a recursive loop and afraid when
see also Differences between LINQ to Objects and LINQ to SQL queries We are
I have a class containing Linq To SQL objects that are used to populate
In my repository layer I am mapping Linq-to-Sql objects to my application domain objects.
I noticed that MVC lets you pass in LINQ to SQL objects to its
Linq to SQL creates objects which are IQueryable and full of relations. Html Helpers

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.