Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5960369
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T18:49:03+00:00 2026-05-22T18:49:03+00:00

Linq to SQL has this very simple model: DataContext and attributes [Table] and [Column]

  • 0

Linq to SQL has this very simple model: DataContext and attributes [Table] and [Column] and no need for a config file.

But I understand Linq2SQL does not have a future.

How do I do something equivalent in entity framework?

(Equivalent = no config file)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T18:49:03+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 6:49 pm

    In EF 4.1 Code-First you can configure your mapping in a fluent way as opposed to a config file.

    It is convention based so it will infer lot of thing from your model (eg: Table column are automatically mapped to properties if both names match).EF Code First Model

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a very simple application which currently has a single Linq to Sql
Using C#, Linq to SQL, SQL Server, I have this: MyTable has a column
I love LINQ to SQL but it has been bugging me that in using
Microsoft has made saving objects very easy with their LINQ to SQL mapping. However,
I have a very simple set-up. Table Node has a nullable foreign key ObjectId.
In LINQ to SQL there is a very simple convention to tell the mapper
I have been using LINQ to SQL for years now, but this is the
Has anyone compared the speed of performance between LINQ to SQL against the Entity
I've just started using Linq to SQL, and I'm wondering if anyone has any
LINQ to SQL allows table mappings to automatically convert back and forth to Enums

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.