Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6778827
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T16:18:45+00:00 2026-05-26T16:18:45+00:00

LINQ’s AsParallel returns ParallelQuery . I wonder if it’s possible to change this behavior

  • 0

LINQ’s AsParallel returns ParallelQuery. I wonder if it’s possible to change this behavior so that I could compare the LINQ statement run with and without parallelism without actually changing the code? This behavior should be similar to Debug.Assert – when DEBUG preprocessor directive is not set, it’s optimized out. So I’d like to be able to make AsParallel return the same type without converting it to ParallelQuery.

I suppose I can declare my own extension method (because I can’t override AsParallel) and have that preprocessor directive analyzed within it:

    public static class MyExtensions
    {
#if TURN_OFF_LINQ_PARALLELISM
        public static IEnumerable<T> AsControllableParallel<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable)
        {
            return enumerable;
        }
#else
        public static ParallelQuery<T> AsControllableParallel<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable)
        {
            return enumerable.AsParallel();
        }
#endif
    }

I wonder if there is any other way. Am I asking for too much?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T16:18:46+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:18 pm

    What about

                var result = 
                    source
    #if TURN_ON_LINQ_PARALLELISM
                    .AsParallel()
    #endif
                    .Select(value => value.StartsWith("abcd"));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Linq has this handy function Where that lets me filter the results of an
My linq query returns a collection of IEnumerable<object> . How can I convert this
In LINQ to SQL, is it possible to check to see if an entity
In Linq to SQL it is possible to generate the database from the dbml
This Linq to SQL query ... Return (From t In Db.Concessions Where t.Country =
This LINQ and lambda expressions are killing me, so there is me again searching
Linq allows you to create new object inside of a query expression. This is
This linq works fine: return (from page in db.WebPages where pageids.Contains(page.page_id) select new Result
Using LINQ I would like to retrieve all files under a given directory that
Following linq statement generates multiple trips to the database, is there a way to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.