Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 509193
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:59:08+00:00 2026-05-13T06:59:08+00:00

Linux gcc 4.4.1 I have this function that passes this second parameter that casts

  • 0

Linux gcc 4.4.1

I have this function that passes this second parameter that casts it to a different type. I am just wondering am I correct?

It looks to me that it is casting the function evt_hdlr to a void * type to a long pointer type.

if(enable_evt_hdlr(EV_ANY, (long (*) (void *)) evt_hdlr) == -1)
{
..
}

The function evt_hdlr definition looks like this:

static int32_t evt_hdlr(void);

Many thanks for any suggestions,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:59:08+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:59 am

    You cast a function without parameters and returning an int32_t to a function-pointer with a void* parameter, returning a long. This might work, but it’s more luck than skill (long and int32_t are not necessarily the same).

    If you can’t change the type of enable_evt_hdlr or evt_hdlr, then make an in-between function:

    static long my_evt_hdlr(void*)
    {
      return (long) evt_hdlr();
    }
    

    and pass this to event-handler. This way the stack will be handled as promised.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 301k
  • Answers 301k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It turns out that it's easy enough to get the… May 13, 2026 at 8:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Apparently its a bug and logged on github.com May 13, 2026 at 8:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I sent an email to Chris AtLee asking whether we… May 13, 2026 at 8:08 pm

Related Questions

I've been messing around with some x86 assembly as its come up in a
What could cause this? Here's the stack trace: #0 0x0645c0f5 in std::_Rb_tree_increment (__x=0x83ee5b0) at
I have two Slackware Linux systems on which the POSIX semaphore sem_open() call fails
My code is using std::count() on a list of an abstract data type that
I'm investigating a deadlock bug. I took a core with gcore , and found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.