Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Linux’s stddef.h defines offsetof() as:
#define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) ((size_t) &((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER)
whereas the Wikipedia article on offsetof() (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offsetof) defines it as:
#define offsetof(st, m) \
((size_t) ( (char *)&((st *)(0))->m - (char *)0 ))
Why subtract (char *)0 in the Wikipedia version? Is there any case where that would actually make a difference?
The first version converts a pointer into an integer with a cast, which is not portable.
The second version is more portable across a wider variety of compilers, because it relies on pointer arithmetic by the compiler to get an integer result instead of a typecast.
BTW, I was the editor that added the original code to the Wiki entry, which was the Linux form. Later editors changed it to the more portable version.