Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7882761
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T04:21:41+00:00 2026-06-03T04:21:41+00:00

Long story short, I have an RMI Server and Client. The Server and Client

  • 0

Long story short, I have an RMI Server and Client. The Server and Client are capable of making RMI calls on each other. After the Client connects to the Server, the Server may make many hundreds of method calls in quick succession on the Client.

The problem is this – towards the end of a huge batch of Server-to-Client method calls, some will fail because RMI claims it cannot establish a connection from Server-to-Client, even though hundreds of calls before it will succeed. I can’t post any real code because this project is rather large (about 50k lines), but here’s the full stack trace of the exception that gets thrown:

java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is:
java.rmi.ConnectIOException: error during JRMP connection establishment; nested exception is:
java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invokeRemoteMethod(Unknown Source)
at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invoke(Unknown Source)
at $Proxy0.findClassDefinition(Unknown Source)
at com.fabric.network.NetworkClassLoader.findClass(NetworkClassLoader.java:111)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at com.fabric.network.NetworkClassLoader.loadClass(NetworkClassLoader.java:131)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at com.fabric.network.MessageSocket$CustomObjectInputStream.resolveClass(MessageSocket.java:171)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(Unknown Source)
at com.fabric.network.MessageSocket.receive(MessageSocket.java:118)
at com.fabric.application.driver.NodeRemoteDriver$IncomingMessageThread.run(NodeRemoteDriver.java:205)
Caused by: java.rmi.ConnectIOException: error during JRMP connection establishment; nested exception is:
java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.createConnection(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.newConnection(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invokeRemoteMethod(Unknown Source)
at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invoke(Unknown Source)
at $Proxy2.findClassDefinition(Unknown Source)
at com.fabric.network.ClassDefinitionCache.findClassDefinition(ClassDefinitionCache.java:78)
at com.fabric.management.host.NodeManagementServices.findClassDefinition(NodeManagementServices.java:231)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor16.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(Unknown Source)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(Unknown Source)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(Unknown Source)
at java.io.DataInputStream.readByte(Unknown Source)
... 21 more

Again, sorry I can’t provide much in the way of code, but I’m not necessarily asking for a code fix – I just want to wrap my head around why this might be happening.

EDIT

Added the full stack trace.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T04:21:42+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 4:21 am

    Ok, so after nearly pulling all my hair out, it turns out that RMI was trying to open up way too many ports. I am using a custom RMISocketFactory implementation under the hood. This custom implementation is a singleton, so I didn’t think it was necessary to implement hashCode() and equals(). A very painful mistake indeed…

    Turns out, RMI won’t reuse sockets if RMI determines that the socket it needs to create is to be created by an RMISocketFactory that isn’t equivalent to the factory that created the socket it wants to reuse. RMI relies on equals() and hashCode() to perform this check. Once I correctly implemented these two methods in my custom socket factory, these intermittent problems went away.

    The description of this issue can be found here:

    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/rmi/faq.html

    At any rate, thanks to all for taking a look at this, I sure appreciate your time!

    Additional Information

    A secondary issue that I didn’t notice before was that the ServerSocket I was using was running out of queue space for incoming connection requests, which also contributed to the connections being dropped. Using the constructor new ServerSocket(port, newConnectionQueueSize, bindAddress) with a larger newConnectionQueueSize contributed to solving this problem as well.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Long story short: I have a BDC application definition in my sharepoint 2007 server,
Long story short, I have a substantial Python application that, among other things, does
Long story short, I have an ASP.NET application I'm trying to debug and at
So long story short, i have some forms (2) of them that, need different
Long story short, we found files promoting prescription drugs on our server that we
Long story short, I'm making a custom Swing component that's basically a JTable with
Long story short, client's hosting is using php 5.2.5 and i desperately need to
Hey, long story short I have inherited some terrible code. As a result a
Long story short, I have a long code that uses jQuery. Lots of files,
Long story short, I have a struct (see below) that contains exactly one field:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.