Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5967425
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T19:56:32+00:00 2026-05-22T19:56:32+00:00

Look at the following code: int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { // This works:

  • 0

Look at the following code:

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
    // This works: (Disable Lang Ext = *Yes* (/Za))
    wchar_t wc0 = L'\0';
    wchar_t wc_ = L'';
    assert(wc0 == wc_);

    // This doesn't compile (VC++ 2010):
    char c0 = '\0';
    char c_ = ''; // error C2137: empty character constant
    assert(c0 == c_);
    return 0;
}

Why does the compiler allow defining an empty character literal for wide characters? This doesn’t make sense for wide, just as it doesn’t make sense for char where the compiler flags an error.

Is this allowed by the Standard?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T19:56:33+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 7:56 pm

    This is a bug in VC++.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

look at the following simple code: #include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace std; int
I have the following code : public class Main { private int i =
Please take a look at following code: #include <stdio.h> #include <iostream> using namespace std;
Please look at the following code: #include <iostream> using namespace std; class A {
Have a look here: In the following code, what would be the type of
Consider the following code template<typename T, int N> struct A { typedef T value_type;
I have the following code: int intNumber1 = 100; object intNumber2 = 100; bool
I have a few procedures, for simplicity sake, look like the following: public string
Moments ago Jeff Atwood said the following on twitter : Look, I love rapid
We mostly tend to following the above best practice. Have a look at String

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.