Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7934141
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T21:33:13+00:00 2026-06-03T21:33:13+00:00

Make’s implicit rules are supposedly there to make writing Makefiles easier but, if my

  • 0

Make’s implicit rules are supposedly there to make writing Makefiles easier but, if my understanding is correct, if my C files depend on any header files, I need to write the rule, explicitly. Am I right? This seems to serioiusly lower the usefulness of implicit rules, since most C files depend on a couple of header files, so I thought perhaps there’s something I’m missing.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T21:33:15+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    You don’t need to write the rule, only the dependencies. Example:

    foo.o : foo.h bar.h
    

    The file foo.o will still be generated by the implicit rule, but have the additional dependencies foo.h and bar.h. This dependency line can also be auto-generated by most compilers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When make -ing under Vim, there is often a need to vimgrep the files.
I make lot of dealing with RFID cards. As much as there are different
Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler. Can we find the solution/s
I make the deployment site with TeamCity. Today there is a need to deploy
I make a j2me application that almost all of it, are text files. size:
I make navigation with pages but this code not work, what's the problem ?
I make asynchronous call for same URL for multiple times, But the response came
I make one action method for 2 activities (new input and edit), and there
To make things easier when switching between machines (my workstation at the office and
make is not only useful for building your programming project, but it seems to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.