Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8013623
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T19:40:48+00:00 2026-06-04T19:40:48+00:00

Maybe I should just embrace the brackets but I can’t help but feel an

  • 0

Maybe I should just embrace the brackets but I can’t help but feel an operator such as the dollar sign which exists in Haskell would really clean up code and increase readability.

I’m looking for Something that gives precedence / binds to to all the symbols following it.

putStrLn (show $ 1 + 1)
putStrLn $ show (1 + 1)
putStrLn $ show $ 1 + 1

I know about the threading operators. Those are very useful and certainly increase readability but they don’t actually reduce bracket count. In most cases as they appear more similar to function composition (Which would be the Haskell . operator).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T19:40:50+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 7:40 pm

    The $ operator relies on low binding precedence, in fact, the lowest.

    Since Clojure, Scheme and Lisp don’t support user-defined precedence or fixity, it isn’t possible to define these syntactic constructs in the way Haskell does.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Maybe I should just keep my mouth shut and move forward, but something tells
UPDATE: Exactly like this: but in jQuery... Maybe I should just spend sometime porting
Maybe I should just make this a public member, but I keep thinking it
Is there such a thing? Maybe there should be, I don't think Microsoft built
I've read I should use money , but in todays fast paced world maybe
Maybe I should first give an idea of what I want to accomplish as
Is there any way to move an object forward in Three.js? Maybe I should
i dont know if i should be asking this here (im now thinking maybe
I'm new to nodejs and maybe don't got an event system how it should
...Maybe imperative programming with mutable data is just drilled too deep into my brain,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.