Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 84593
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:57:20+00:00 2026-05-10T21:57:20+00:00

Maybe someone found a workaround for the following problem: It seems as if AXIS

  • 0

Maybe someone found a workaround for the following problem:

It seems as if AXIS 1.4 adds an <exceptionName> and a <hostname> element to each custom fault element. In the WSDL the fault is defined to only consist of a custom fault message systemMessage.

This is the answer returned from my service. Never mind about the error, it could be any error that is returned as a fault.

<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' xmlns:xsd='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'>    <soapenv:Body>       <soapenv:Fault>          <faultcode>soapenv:Server.generalException</faultcode>          <faultstring/>          <detail>             <ns1:systemMessage xmlns:ns1='http://my.domain/workflow/engine/wsdl/types'>                <message>nullcvc-datatype-valid.1.2.1: '2008-12-02T00:00:00' is not a valid value for 'date'.cvc-type.3.1.3</message>                <code>XML string is not valid</code>                <parameter/>             </ns1:systemMessage>             <ns2:exceptionName xmlns:ns2='http://xml.apache.org/axis/'>com.domain.commons.ws.schema.SystemMessageType</ns2:exceptionName>             <ns3:hostname xmlns:ns4='http://xml.apache.org/axis/'>my.host.com</ns3:hostname>          </detail>       </soapenv:Fault>    </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> 

It seems as if this is an error in Axis 1.4. Does anyone know a workaround for this behaviour?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:57:21+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:57 pm

    There’s a workaround for the problem:

    In the AXIS generated fault class that extends from org.apache.axis.AxisFault alter the constructors as follows in order to suppress the elements (below is the fault class that is used for the fault returned in the question):

    public SystemMessageType() {     // Suppress the two elements     this.removeHostname();     this.removeFaultDetail(org.apache.axis.Constants.QNAME_FAULTDETAIL_EXCEPTIONNAME); }  public SystemMessageType(        java.lang.String message1,        java.lang.String code,        java.lang.String[] parameter) {     // Call the default constructor     this();     this.message1 = message1;     this.code = code;     this.parameter = parameter; } 

    This workaround solves the problem. Nevertheless, whenever you regenerate your code for the SOAP web service you have to adapt the fault class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I found a problem which I can't find solution, maybe someone has seen this
I have search the net and found nothing. Maybe someone here might have used
I havent found info on this subject yet, but maybe someone have tried doing
I'm betting that someone has already solved this and maybe I'm using the wrong
Possible Duplicate: How do I calculate someone's age in C#? Maybe this could be
Maybe I'm just thinking about this too hard, but I'm having a problem figuring
I'm not for sure how the ControlCollection of ASP.Net works, so maybe someone can
I've edited original text to save potential readers some time and health. Maybe someone
For me iframes are pure evil (well, maybe not so pure). They seems to
Out of ideas and about to start pulling my hair out. Maybe someone out

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.