Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 728755
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:43:05+00:00 2026-05-14T06:43:05+00:00

Maybe this question has been asked many times before, but I never found a

  • 0

Maybe this question has been asked many times before, but I never found a satisfying answer.

The problem:



I have to simulate a process scheduler, using the round robin strategy. I’m using threads to simulate processes and multiprogramming; everything works fine with the JVM managing the threads. But the thing is that now I want to have control of all the threads so that I can run each thread alone by a certain quantum (or time), just like real OS processes schedulers.

What I’m thinking to do:




I want have a list of all threads, as I iterate the list I want to execute each thread for their corresponding quantum, but as soon the time’s up I want to pause that thread indefinitely until all threads in the list are executed and then when I reach the same thread again resume it and so on.


The question:




So is their a way, without using deprecated methods stop(), suspend(), or resume(), to have this control over threads?


  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:43:06+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:43 am

    Who said Java is not low level enough?

    Here is my 3 minute solution. I hope it fits your needs.

    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.List;
    
    public class ThreadScheduler {
    
        private List<RoundRobinProcess> threadList
                = new ArrayList<RoundRobinProcess>();
    
        public ThreadScheduler(){
            for (int i = 0 ; i < 100 ; i++){
                threadList.add(new RoundRobinProcess());
                new Thread(threadList.get(i)).start();
            }
        }
    
    
        private class RoundRobinProcess implements Runnable{
    
            private final Object lock = new Object();
            private volatile boolean suspend = false , stopped = false;
    
            @Override
            public void run() {
                while(!stopped){
                    while (!suspend){
                        // do work
                    }
                    synchronized (lock){
                        try {
                            lock.wait();
                        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                            Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
                            return;
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
    
            public void suspend(){
                suspend = true;
            }
            public void stop(){
                suspend = true;stopped = true;
                synchronized (lock){
                    lock.notifyAll();
                }
            }
    
            public void resume(){
                suspend = false;
                synchronized (lock){
                    lock.notifyAll();
                }
            }
    
        }
    }
    

    Please note that “do work” should not be blocking.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Maybe this has been asked before, but I couldn't find it. My question is
This has been asked before (question no. 308581) , but that particular question and
I feel like this one has been asked before, but I'm unable to find
Sorry if this question has all ready been asked, maybe someone can point me
This is related to the this question and the answer maybe the same but
I'm certain this has been asked before, with with nearly 900k questions, it's hard
Update: I can't delete this question, because the answer has been upvoted, yet it
Maybe this is a dumb question, but is there any way to convert a
Maybe this is a dumb question, but I have the following behavior in Visual
This question is for a web application. And maybe it's a stupid question but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.