Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8936723
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T10:16:36+00:00 2026-06-15T10:16:36+00:00

memset() is declared to return void* that is always the same value as the

  • 0

memset() is declared to return void* that is always the same value as the address passed into the function.

What’s the use of the return value? Why does it not return void?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T10:16:37+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 10:16 am

    The signature is in line with all the other similar functions: memcpy(), strcpy() etc. I always thought this was done to enable one to chain calls to such functions, and to otherwise use such calls in expressions.

    That said, I’ve never come across a real-world situation where I would feel compelled to use the return value in such a manner.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does this function has the same behavior that memset ? inline void SetZeroArray( void
Is there any equivalent function of memset for vectors in C++ ? (Not clear()
Is there a version of memset() which sets a value that is larger than
I have worked in C++ with memset() and definitely this function need not to
Is it not possible to use memset on an array of integers? I tried
The prototype of memset is void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t n); . So
I'm having a weird problem with memset, that was something to do with a
In C and C++ we have the memset() function which can fulfill my wish.
Really basic question here: I've seen a bunch of CoreAudio code that uses memset
Is there a way to reset variables declared as static within a function? The

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.