Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 84595
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:57:21+00:00 2026-05-10T21:57:21+00:00

Microsoft seems hell-bent on deprecating the swiss-army-knife of database tools. What else comes close

  • 0

Microsoft seems hell-bent on deprecating the swiss-army-knife of database tools. What else comes close for facading/file-swapping/cloning/name-your-acronym-connecting arbitrary database servers/spreadsheets/CSV’s/flatfiles?

What weird kinds of functionality have you squeezed out of Access? And what else is there to take its place?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:57:22+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:57 pm

    Access is not a DBMS. Or at least it’s not just a simple DBMS. It’s a very good RAD environment, a simple way to create SQL code graphically, and a regular front-end to fully fledged DBMs.

    Neither SQL Server (Express or MSDE) nor Oracle, MySQL, etc. will ever replace it, until they come integrated with a simple programming language, a Crystal Reports like facility and a way for beginners to get around without having to learn SQL.

    At my first professional job I developed a very big system completely in Access. Front end for the clients, admin front for me, reports and monitoring for management, permissions per user, automatic tasks run at certain times, etc. I came to learn a lot of its flaws and strengths as a result.

    I’ve seen marvelous apps done with it, as well as pieces of crap. I still use it for personal projects, and ain’t’ ashamed of it (for instance, a Sudoku player, or a Karnaugh mapping implementation). There’s an MVP who’s created a Paint clone completely in Access, though I believe that’s extreme.

    Access’ pearls: It’s nice to easily test a database design idea and have sketch forms, reports, etc. created for you. If you change a column’s name (or even a table, though that fails sometimes) it’s nice to see all references to that have changed to the new name, automatically. The ‘sub-form’ control rocks, I longed for it on VB6. And the ‘Thunder’ button to do repeated filtering on tables is great, I wish I had something like that on SSMS!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Microsoft seems to want us to stop using the MDI, but if more people
According to the 'Microsoft Office Word™ 2003 Visual Basic Reference', it seems the Document
It seems that some Microsoft frameworks are only known by name and reputation, not
We use Microsoft.Samples.BizTalk.Adapter.Common library for our custom SMTP Receive Adapter. Everything seems fine except
Refering to this link http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b1csw23d.aspx it seems that it is not possible with the
When I import Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel (with added com-reference to Excel Object library), it seems to
Registered my program according to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa767914.aspx . The association seems to be working, because
I am looking for Math.Abs(ulong,ulong) with return type ulong. But it seems Microsoft only
Microsoft SQL Server seems to check column name validity, but not table name validity
Looking at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd287191(v=vs.110).aspx , it seems that ConcurrentDictionary and all of its friends in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.