Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4007604
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T08:39:08+00:00 2026-05-20T08:39:08+00:00

Most C++ users that learned C prefer to use the printf / scanf family

  • 0

Most C++ users that learned C prefer to use the printf / scanf family of functions even when they’re coding in C++.

Although I admit that I find the interface way better (especially POSIX-like format and localization), it seems that an overwhelming concern is performance.

Taking at look at this question:

How can I speed up line by line reading of a file

It seems that the best answer is to use fscanf and that the C++ ifstream is consistently 2-3 times slower.

I thought it would be great if we could compile a repository of “tips” to improve IOStreams performance, what works, what does not.

Points to consider

  • buffering (rdbuf()->pubsetbuf(buffer, size))
  • synchronization (std::ios_base::sync_with_stdio)
  • locale handling (Could we use a trimmed-down locale, or remove it altogether ?)

Of course, other approaches are welcome.

Note: a “new” implementation, by Dietmar Kuhl, was mentioned, but I was unable to locate many details about it. Previous references seem to be dead links.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T08:39:08+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 8:39 am

    Here is what I have gathered so far:

    Buffering:

    If by default the buffer is very small, increasing the buffer size can definitely improve the performance:

    • it reduces the number of HDD hits
    • it reduces the number of system calls

    Buffer can be set by accessing the underlying streambuf implementation.

    char Buffer[N];
    
    std::ifstream file("file.txt");
    
    file.rdbuf()->pubsetbuf(Buffer, N);
    // the pointer reader by rdbuf is guaranteed
    // to be non-null after successful constructor
    

    Warning courtesy of @iavr: according to cppreference it is best to call pubsetbuf before opening the file. Various standard library implementations otherwise have different behaviors.

    Locale Handling:

    Locale can perform character conversion, filtering, and more clever tricks where numbers or dates are involved. They go through a complex system of dynamic dispatch and virtual calls, so removing them can help trimming down the penalty hit.

    The default C locale is meant not to perform any conversion as well as being uniform across machines. It’s a good default to use.

    Synchronization:

    I could not see any performance improvement using this facility.

    One can access a global setting (static member of std::ios_base) using the sync_with_stdio static function.

    Measurements:

    Playing with this, I have toyed with a simple program, compiled using gcc 3.4.2 on SUSE 10p3 with -O2.

    C : 7.76532e+06
    C++: 1.0874e+07

    Which represents a slowdown of about 20%… for the default code. Indeed tampering with the buffer (in either C or C++) or the synchronization parameters (C++) did not yield any improvement.

    Results by others:

    @Irfy on g++ 4.7.2-2ubuntu1, -O3, virtualized Ubuntu 11.10, 3.5.0-25-generic, x86_64, enough ram/cpu, 196MB of several “find / >> largefile.txt” runs

    C : 634572
    C++: 473222

    C++ 25% faster

    @Matteo Italia on g++ 4.4.5, -O3, Ubuntu Linux 10.10 x86_64 with a random 180 MB file

    C : 910390
    C++: 776016

    C++ 17% faster

    @Bogatyr on g++ i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664), mac mini, 4GB ram, idle except for this test with a 168MB datafile

    C : 4.34151e+06
    C++: 9.14476e+06

    C++ 111% slower

    @Asu on clang++ 3.8.0-2ubuntu4, Kubuntu 16.04 Linux 4.8-rc3, 8GB ram, i5 Haswell, Crucial SSD, 88MB datafile (tar.xz archive)

    C : 270895
    C++: 162799

    C++ 66% faster

    So the answer is: it’s a quality of implementation issue, and really depends on the platform :/

    The code in full here for those interested in benchmarking:

    #include <fstream>
    #include <iostream>
    #include <iomanip>
    
    #include <cmath>
    #include <cstdio>
    
    #include <sys/time.h>
    
    template <typename Func>
    double benchmark(Func f, size_t iterations)
    {
      f();
    
      timeval a, b;
      gettimeofday(&a, 0);
      for (; iterations --> 0;)
      {
        f();
      }
      gettimeofday(&b, 0);
      return (b.tv_sec * (unsigned int)1e6 + b.tv_usec) -
             (a.tv_sec * (unsigned int)1e6 + a.tv_usec);
    }
    
    
    struct CRead
    {
      CRead(char const* filename): _filename(filename) {}
    
      void operator()() {
        FILE* file = fopen(_filename, "r");
    
        int count = 0;
        while ( fscanf(file,"%s", _buffer) == 1 ) { ++count; }
    
        fclose(file);
      }
    
      char const* _filename;
      char _buffer[1024];
    };
    
    struct CppRead
    {
      CppRead(char const* filename): _filename(filename), _buffer() {}
    
      enum { BufferSize = 16184 };
    
      void operator()() {
        std::ifstream file(_filename, std::ifstream::in);
    
        // comment to remove extended buffer
        file.rdbuf()->pubsetbuf(_buffer, BufferSize);
    
        int count = 0;
        std::string s;
        while ( file >> s ) { ++count; }
      }
    
      char const* _filename;
      char _buffer[BufferSize];
    };
    
    
    int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    {
      size_t iterations = 1;
      if (argc > 1) { iterations = atoi(argv[1]); }
    
      char const* oldLocale = setlocale(LC_ALL,"C");
      if (strcmp(oldLocale, "C") != 0) {
        std::cout << "Replaced old locale '" << oldLocale << "' by 'C'\n";
      }
    
      char const* filename = "largefile.txt";
    
      CRead cread(filename);
      CppRead cppread(filename);
    
      // comment to use the default setting
      bool oldSyncSetting = std::ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
    
      double ctime = benchmark(cread, iterations);
      double cpptime = benchmark(cppread, iterations);
    
      // comment if oldSyncSetting's declaration is commented
      std::ios_base::sync_with_stdio(oldSyncSetting);
    
      std::cout << "C  : " << ctime << "\n"
                   "C++: " << cpptime << "\n";
    
      return 0;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a working Facebook app that most users will use just once. Leading
What's the easiest way of me converting the simpler regex format that most users
I have a table that saves some account limits like users. For most rows
class User has_many :books I need a query that returns: Users whose most recent
I have a program that needs to run as a normal user most of
I work on an Internet-facing, ASP.NET-based product that uses SQL Server 2005. Most customers
I know that most links should be left up to the end-user to decide
Most of my users have email addresses associated with their profile in /etc/passwd .
From reading the Apple Docs on Core Data, I've learned that you should not
EDIT: Learned that Webmethods actually uses NLST, not LIST, if that matters Our business

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.