Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Most interested in peer-to-peer solutions – without central server. So, I imagine it like a library that brings to my application a functionality of transparent cache management with feature of remote instances synchronization. It should support cache record timeout and forcing invalidation.
UPDATE: If not completely peer-to-peer – at least with multiple servers feature.
The next best thing after Memcached is Redis:
(+) it supports more data types;
(+) has persistent storage;
(-/+) has a few C++ clients that seem active (as of 09/2018) but none of them are "recommended".