Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 102421
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T00:57:36+00:00 2026-05-11T00:57:36+00:00

Most mathematicians agree that: e πi + 1 = 0 However, most floating point

  • 0

Most mathematicians agree that:

eπi + 1 = 0

However, most floating point implementations disagree. How well can we settle this dispute?

I’m keen to hear about different languages and implementations, and various methods to make the result as close to zero as possible. Be creative!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T00:57:36+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:57 am

    It’s not that most floating point implementations disagree, it’s just that they cannot get the accuracy necessary to get a 100% answer. And the correct answer is that they can’t.

    PI is an infinite series of digits that nobody has been able to denote by anything other than a symbolic representation, and e^X is the same, and thus the only way to get to 100% accuracy is to go symbolic.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Most of the implementations I find require a hardware instruction to do this. However
MOST of what the Flash is capable of jQuery can do that too... plus
Most of time we represent concepts which can never be less than 0. For
From WolframAlpha: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Function.html While this notation is deprecated by professional mathematicians, it is the
Most will recommend caching as a list. I know that is a solution and
most of the time in the service code I would have something like this:
Most com methods have a signature like this: STDMETHOD(someFunc) (THIS_ ParamType param) PURE; Which
Most examples I can find showing how to work with attributes show how to
Most command-line programs just operate on one line at a time. Can I use
Most of the time in C programming it seems that there will be one

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.