Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 43245
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T15:27:54+00:00 2026-05-10T15:27:54+00:00

Moved from preview 2 to preview 5 and now my Html.ActionLink calls are all

  • 0

Moved from preview 2 to preview 5 and now my Html.ActionLink calls are all failing. It appears that the generic version has been replaced with a non-type safe version.

// used to work <li>   <%= Html.ActionLink<HomeController>(c => c.Index(), 'Home')%> </li> // what appears I can only do now <li>   <%= Html.ActionLink<HomeController>('Index', 'Home')%> </li> 

Why did The Gu do this? Has it been moved to Microsoft.Web.Mvc or somewhere else as a ‘future’? Is there a replacement that is generic? Halp!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T15:27:54+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 3:27 pm

    Don’t blame the GU, it’s my fault. That method has been moved to MvcFutures. Here’s a blog post that provides the foundation for why this change was made.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to re-invent Preview.app. I've been told that some examples in /Developers/Examples/AppKit will
Ive moved from autoit and am now learning C++ and some problems keep coming
I recently moved from matplotlib version '0.99.1.1' to '1.0.1'. A new glitch i'm encountering
We've just updated ASP.NET from Preview 3 to Preview 5 and we've run into
I've got a small program that displays third-party generated HTML pages. It's really just
Objective Have a small magnifying glass icon that appears in the top right corner
Just moved from Django 1.00 to 1.30 and I'm suddenly getting an error during
i moved from php to rails3, and i still think it was a good
I've recently moved from VS to eclipse and am using the intellisense functionality. I
Our IT department recently moved from our databases to a cluster. This move broke

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.