Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 75425
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:30:51+00:00 2026-05-10T20:30:51+00:00

MS SQL has a convenient workaround for concatenating a column value from multiple rows

  • 0

MS SQL has a convenient workaround for concatenating a column value from multiple rows into one value:

SELECT col1  FROM table1  WHERE col2 = 'x'  ORDER by col3  FOR XML path('') 

and that returns a nice recordset:

XML_F52E2B61-18A1-11d1-B105-00805F49916B                                      ----------------------------------------  <col1>Foo</col1><col1>Bar</col1> 

only the column name in the returned recordset is rather nasty!

The column name seems to include random elements (or a GUID), and hence I am reluctant to use it in my application (different instances or different servers might have another GUID). Unfortunately I cannot use * to select the value, and due to the restrictions in the existing application I cannot iterate through returned columns, either…

Is there a way to force the column name in the returned recordset to something more sensible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:30:51+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:30 pm

    That should do:

    select( SELECT col1  FROM table1  WHERE col2 = 'x'  ORDER by col3  FOR XML path('') ) as myName 

    Not pretty but should give the result that you need

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 120k
  • Answers 120k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I changed the name of SiteResources.en-US.resx to SiteResources.resx and now… May 12, 2026 at 12:05 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer "Location" is actually a property of the window object, not… May 12, 2026 at 12:05 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer That's Python 2 syntax. I assume scons doesn't run on… May 12, 2026 at 12:05 am

Related Questions

I've worked on a number of CMS systems using the .NET platform (the CMS
I am wondering what your thoughts are on maintaining relationship constraints within a MS
You'd like to call a stored proc on MS SQL that has a parameter
I have a MS SQL table that I don't have any control over and

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.