Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
My app requires that devices are running at least Android 2.0 OS. Would it make more sense for me to compile my project with the 2.0 SDK or does it make more sense to always compile my project using the latest SDK, even if it’s well beyond 2.0…?
The problem with compiling against 2.1 for example would be that I don’t know if an Android 2.0 device would even run an app compiled with 2.1…?
You can target a later SDK version using
android:targetSdkVersionwhile still permitting your app to be run on earlier versions (since apps are filtered out based on theandroid:minSdkVersion). If you use API’s that aren’t supported, your app will force close. So, you’ll have to pay attention to the API level annotations in the documentation for all functions, and test your app on an emulator set to use the minimum SDK version.However, the Android Developer’s Blog has some good advice on how to write applications that support earlier SDK versions – at a cost of some added work, of course. Whether it’s worth it depends on whom you want to reach, obviously.