Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 815983
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T01:45:55+00:00 2026-05-15T01:45:55+00:00

My application performs a number of queries with the general form: SELECT <aggregate-functions> FROM

  • 0

My application performs a number of queries with the general form:

SELECT <aggregate-functions>
FROM <table-name>
WHERE <where-clause>
GROUP BY <group-by column list>

I would like to know how many records contributed to the aggregate result set (in other words, how many records matched the conditions in the WHERE clause), something that is hidden because of both both the aggregate functions in the SELECT clause and the GROUP-BY clause. I know that I could do a simple SELECT COUNT(*) using the same WHERE clause to get that number, but I would like to avoid a second query if at all possible. Is there a SQL Server feature/function/etc that will produce that value without another query?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T01:45:55+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:45 am

    A simple solution would be a subselect:

    Select ...
        , ( Select Count(*) 
            From Table 
            Where ...) As TotalCount
    From Table
    Where ...
    Group By ...
    

    If you are using SQL Server 2005 or later, you can do something like the following:

    With RankedItems As
        (
        Select Col1
            , Row_Number() Over ( Order By Col1 Asc, Col2 Asc... ) As Num
            , Row_Number() Over ( Order By Col1 Desc, Col2 Desc ) As RevNum
        From Table
        Where ...
        )
    Select Col1, Min(Num + RevNum - 1) As TotalCount
    From RankedItems
    Group By Col1
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.