Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 891895
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T13:57:46+00:00 2026-05-15T13:57:46+00:00

My application uses large trees of domain objects and for most of these objects

  • 0

My application uses large trees of domain objects and for most of these objects I’d like to persist some basic information (updatedby, modified time, etc.). I have already added these properties & columns to my application.

I was about to code the setting of these values in all the various constructors, etc. when it occurred to me that the persistence layer should handle this transparently.

But how?

I could certainly do this from within my DAO’s, but how to handle the objects that are persisted via a cascade save? Is there a way to intercept the persist() method on those?

What’s a good way to implement this capability?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T13:57:48+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:57 pm

    If you intend to use JPA for the purpose of auditing, you can rely on the PrePersist and PreUpdate callback annotations. The JPA WikiBook has one such example. It helps greatly to have a mapped superclass in this case, otherwise you will continue to do this via “user” space code.

    Another way of doing this, is to use triggers (ahem) on tables. This does have a performance impact though. The Openbravo ERP project appears to be using this approach for generating the audit trail.

    Update: It is a good idea to have the auditing functionality separated out into a different class, other than the super class of the domain model. JPA Event listeners will help you achieve the same. A good example is present here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.