Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6830271
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T22:35:53+00:00 2026-05-26T22:35:53+00:00

My C is a bit shaky, but I’ve looked at python’s source code and

  • 0

My C is a bit shaky, but I’ve looked at python’s source code and it looks like most of python’s re module is implemented by state machines. This comes as no surprise since regular expressions can be reduced to deterministic finite state machines.

I imagine other regex implementations are similar. But few, if any, modern regex implementations are regular according to the textbook definition. Then how do they account for irregularity, like backreferences?

(.*)\1   // this is not regular
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T22:35:54+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 10:35 pm

    They use an amended (beyond finite state) automaton class to account for this, and more complicated matching algorithms than the vanilla Thomson algorithm. You’re very lucking if you find a formal characterization of the automaton class that any particular “RE” engine supports.

    From what I can make up from the Python re source code, it stores the group in a buffer (it has to anyway, since it must return this as part of the match object) and does a straightforward string match in the matching algorithm, consuming as many characters as there are in the group match buffer.

    [Optional rant: unfortunately, RE engines in practice are collections of hacks on top of NFAs that destroy their mathematical properties. Many implementers ignore the elegant algebra of regular languages and their powerful extension to regular relations, which can be efficiently captured by FSTs.]

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My knowledge of Lambda expressions is a bit shaky, while I can write code
Bit of an odd question but I want to do something like: a =
Bit of an Objective-C rookie, I've looked around for an answer but haven't been
Bit of a strange question here i know. but i wanted to know if
Bit of an odd question but is there a way of seeing what objects
Bit of a bizarre question, but does anyone know the actual limit to the
Bit confused here, I have an on-demand instance but do I get charged even
I'm using jquery to animate a bit my web site, but I'm having a
Bit of an edge case, but any idea why &&= would behave this way?
Bit of a dumb question, but I'm wondering what the accepted way of passing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.