Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 802401
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T23:35:46+00:00 2026-05-14T23:35:46+00:00

My code looks like the below. Obviously I can’t write ‘Ok’ because the object

  • 0

My code looks like the below. Obviously I can’t write ‘Ok’ because the object has been disposed. I can’t do return sw.Clone() because clone doesn’t exist. If I don’t use a using then at any point between = new and return (like iterating and writing to the object as my example doesn’t do) can have an exception and thus not disposing the object.

Am I to define sw outside of a try block and check if it’s null then dispose in a catch block? That seems like a bit of excessive work. Is there a better way? Is that the only way?

    static void func1()
    {
        using (var sw = func2())
        {
            sw.WriteLine("Ok");
        }
    }
    static StringWriter func2()
    {
        using (var sw = new StringWriter())
        {
            return sw;
        }
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T23:35:47+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 11:35 pm

    You may want to reconsider returning a StringWriter. While you may have a few places where you need that extra functionality, it feels to me like plumbing sticking up in the middle of the living room. It shouldn’t be part of a public API, and is kinda clunky even in a private one.

    With that said, if you need one, don’t Close or Dispose it before returning it, and don’t use a using block. Use a try/catch block (ie: Dispose in the catch, not the finally clause).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 396k
  • Answers 396k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your are on the right track with how you would… May 15, 2026 at 3:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Make sure all plugins are disabled (at least ones that… May 15, 2026 at 3:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can do this easier using a .each() (use this… May 15, 2026 at 3:06 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.