Home/ Questions/Q 7744539
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-01T09:47:31+00:00

My commercial embedded C++ Linux project requires playing wav files and tones at individual

  • 0

My commercial embedded C++ Linux project requires playing wav files and tones at individual volume levels concurrently. A few examples of the sounds:

• “Click” sounds each time user presses screen played at a user-specified volume
• Warning sounds played at max-volume
• Warning tones requested by other applications at app-specified volume level (0-100%)
• Future support for MP3 player and/or video playback (with sound) at user-specified volume. All other sounds should continue while song/video is playing.

We’re using Qt as our UI framework which has QtMultimedia and Phonon support. However, I heard the former has spotty sound support on Linux and the latter is an older version and may be deprecated in an upcoming Qt release.

I’ve done some research and here are a few APIs I’ve come across:
KDE Phonon
SFML
PortAudio
SDL_Mixer
OpenAL Soft
FMOD (though I’d prefer to avoid license fees)
ALSA (perhaps a bit too low-level…)

Other considerations:
Cross-platform isn’t required but preferred. We’d like to limit dependencies as much as possible. There is no need for advanced features like 3D audio or special effects in the foreseeable future. My team doesn’t have much audio experience so ease-of-use is important.

Are any of these overkill for my application? Which seems like the best fit?

Update:
It turns out we were already dependent on SDL for other reasons so we decided on SDL_Mixer. For other Embedded applications, however, I’d take a long at the PortAudio/libsndfile combo as well due to their minimal dependencies.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    i have used SDL_Mixer time and time again, lovely library, it should serve well for your needs, the license is flexible and its heavily documented. i have also experimented with SFML, while more modern and fairly documented, i find it a bit bulky and cumbersome to work with even tho both libraries are very similar. imo SDL_Mixer is the best.

    however you might also want to check out this one i found a few weeks ago http://www.mpg123.de/, i haven’t delved too much into it, but it is very lightweight and again the license is flexible.

    • 0