Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7083803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T07:13:23+00:00 2026-05-28T07:13:23+00:00

My db table will have a col a TEXT with long strings, like multiple

  • 0

My db table will have a col “a” TEXT with long strings, like multiple paragraphs. Given an input string, I want to find the one matching record. If the table has millions of rows, what would be faster? A simple

WHERE a = ? 

Or should I calc and store a md5 hash of each row and then match that? Suggestions welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T07:13:24+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 7:13 am

    If you want an exact match, it will be much quicker to store the hash and compare to that. It will preclude substring searches, but it’s much quicker to compare say 4 characters than to check thousands.

    There will be some overhead to calculate the hash on your search parameter, but it’s nothing compared to a string comparison against that much data.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

A table that extends onto multiple printed pages will have its thead and tfoot
Hi guys I have a table like that? <table> <colgroup> <col class=selected> <col> </colgroup>
I have a table that looks like: <table id=myTable> <col id=name /> <col id=birthYear
Ok I'm at my work this friday setting up a table that will have
I have a MySQL table that will only have one row. What should my
I have a table that potentially will have high number of inserts per second,
I'm working on a project that will have a single table holding lots and
I have a table of transactions which will occasionally have duplicate entries. If/When an
I have created an archive table which will store data for selecting only. Daily
What I can think of is: Algo: Have a hash table which will store

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.