Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8858933
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T14:56:21+00:00 2026-06-14T14:56:21+00:00

My experience until now is, that the error discovery of Eclipse is horribly buggish

  • 0

My experience until now is, that the error discovery of Eclipse is horribly buggish without any solutions (Tried __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__, -std=c++0x, -std=c++11 in nearby every point of the settings). I am at the point that I dont want to search for a solution no more. Now I just want to see solely real compiler errors. But how to accomplish this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T14:56:22+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 2:56 pm

    UPDATE: It’s been a long time since I posted the original answer and it has become outdated. I double-checked today (Mar 15, 2014): in Eclipse Kepler (Build id 20130614-0229) it is sufficient to

    • add under Project > Properties > C/C++ Build > Settings then on the Tool Settings tab GCC C++ Compiler > Miscellaneous the -std=c++11 flag,

    • then under Window > Preferences > C/C++ > Build > Settings on the Discovery tab chose CDT GCC Built-in Compiler Settings and add the -std=c++11 flag to Command to get compiler specs. On my machine it looks like this after the change:

      ${COMMAND} -E -P -v -dD -std=c++11 "${INPUTS}"

    • clean and rebuild both your project and your index (Project > C/C++ Index > Rebuild) as Eclipse tends to cache error messages and show them even though they are gone after changing the settings.

    This works on my machine for sure. If it doesn’t on yours, then you might want to give a shot to this: C++11 full support on Eclipse although I am neither sure about the correctness of this approach nor was it necessary to do it on my machine. As of March 7, 2014 users claim that it helped them whereas the above approach didn’t.


    The original post from 2012, now outdated:


    These bogus errors come from Codan. I also issued a bug report (C++03!!!) but the same problem shows up in the latest stable Eclipse so I don’t think much has happened 🙁

    Workaround:

    Click on the project properties, then C/C++ General > Code Analysis > Syntax and Semantic Errors and deselect whatever false errors you are getting.

    I just want to see solely real compiler errors

    Of course, you can disable there the static analysis completely, in that case you can accomplish exactly what you want.


    UPDATE: 2 users have reported that what Jeevaka wrote helped them. I have tried what he wrote, it did not help me with Juno SR1 and CDT 8.1.1. Perhaps Codan developers have improved static analysis in Juno SR2 and CDT 8.1.2

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I experience strange problem. We have error handling in global.asax that would redirect user
Up until now, my experience with databases has always been working with an intermediate
Basically we have sales people that request leads to call. Right now it tried
Disclaimer: I have no Twitter API experience nor have I used Twitter until today
I experience a weird problem; I have a bash script that runs as wwwrun,
I experience a very strange problem and I don't have found any help to
I have absolutely no experience with AS400 DB2 so please forgive any glaring mistakes
I have been using WSP builder up until now with VS 2008. I recently
I'm studying about the new Process Manager that came automatically with MPICH2, but until
Recently, i began developing a driver of an embedded device running linux. Until now

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.