Question

My gut reaction is no, because managed and unmanaged memory are distinct, but I’m not sure if the .NET Framework is doing something with Marshaling behind the scenes.

What I believe happens is:
When getting a struct from my unmanaged DLL, it is the same as making that call gets an IntPtr and then uses it and the Marshal class to copy the struct into managed memory (and changes made to the struct in managed memory do not bubble up).

I can’t seem to find this documented anywhere on MSDN. Any links would be appreciated.

Here is what my code looks like:

[DllImport("mydll.dll", BestFitMapping=false, CharSet=CharSet.Ansi)]
private static extern int GetStruct(ref MyStruct s);

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Pack=0)]
struct MyStruct
{
     public int    Field1;
     public IntPtr Field2;
}

public void DoSomething()
{
      MyStruct s = new MyStruct();
      GetStruct(ref s);

      s.Field1 = 100; //does unmanaged memory now have 100 in Field1 as well?
      s.Field2 = IntPtr.Zero; //does unmanaged memory now have a NULL pointer in field Field2 as well?
}

Answer 1

CSharp Language Specification.doc pg 26

Struct constructors are invoked with the new operator, but that does not imply that memory is being allocated. Instead of dynamically allocating an object and returning a reference to it, a struct constructor simply returns the struct value itself (typically in a temporary location on the stack), and this value is then copied as necessary.

Since, there is nothing special about a ‘struct’ backing store, so one would not expect there to be annonymous marshalling operations going on behind the member assignments.