Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7729175
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T05:54:08+00:00 2026-06-01T05:54:08+00:00

My (legacy, can’t be changed) schema has a one-to-one relationship between User and UserAddress,

  • 0

My (legacy, can’t be changed) schema has a one-to-one relationship between User and UserAddress, with a composite key:

Users:
- username (PK)
- email (PK)
- firsname
- lastname

UsersAddresses:
- username (PK, FK)
- email (PK, FK)
- city
- street

My original idea was to use a <join to bring them all to the same class:

public class UserDTO
    {
        public string Username { get; set; }
        public string Email { get; set; }

        public string FirstName { get; set; }
        public string City { get; set; }
        //etc...

    }

but I don’t know about the mapping:

Join("UsersAddresses", j=>
                {
                    j.Table("UsersAddresses");
                    j.Fetch(FetchKind.Join);
                    j.Optional(false);
                    j.Key(k=>
                            {
                    //What here???                                          
                    k.Column(c=>
                        {
                            c.Name("");
                            c.Name("");
                        });
                    k.ForeignKey("");
                    k.ForeignKey("");
                });

                                });

Is there a way to achieve this? Or perhaps I should opt for a component or a one-to-one mapping…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T05:54:09+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 5:54 am

    Try with Columns instead of Column – it takes any number of column mapping lambdas to allow mapping objects spanning multiple columns, like your key:

    Join("UsersAddresses", j =>
    {
        j.Table("UsersAddresses");
        j.Fetch(FetchKind.Join);
        j.Optional(false);
        j.Key(k =>
        {
            k.Columns(c =>
            {
                c.Name("username");
                c.ForeignKey("username_fk");
            }, c =>
            {
                c.Name("email");
                c.ForeignKey("email_fk");
            });
        });
    });
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a legacy app that can display crystal reports to the user, using
I have a legacy database which can't be changed because it's hooked up to
Can any one tell me how to convert an legacy application which is vb6
A legacy database has a column changed (containing an updated_at timestamp). This results in
I have a legacy project using Rails 2.3.5 but I can't find with which
I have a legacy table, which I can't change. The values in it can
Working on joining up two legacy DB systems into new database where I can
I've been assigned to a large legacy project, which can only be deployed in
I've got a legacy MS Access DB. How can I see the changes made
I have the following legacy file (can't edit): class Test { public $abc=1; }

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.