Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 796747
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T22:41:14+00:00 2026-05-14T22:41:14+00:00

My method which calls SQL Server returns a DataReader but because of what I

  • 0

My method which calls SQL Server returns a DataReader but because of what I need to do – which is return the DataReader to the calling method which resides in a page code-behind – I can’t close the connection in the class of the method which calls SQL server. Due to this, I have no finally or using blocks.

Is the correct way of disposing resources to make the class implement IDisposable? Alternatively should I explicitly dispose the unmanaged resource (class-level fields) from the caller?

EDIT: I send the datareader back because I need to bind specific data from the datareader to a listitem control, so in the calling class (Codebehind page), I do:

 new ListItem(datareader["dc"]); (along those lines).
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T22:41:14+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 10:41 pm

    I would say yes, implement IDisposable. One of the main reasons as far as I can tell to use it is when you cannot trust the user of the object enough to do it properly themselves. This seems to be a prime candidate for that.

    This being said however, there is a question to your architecture. Why is it that you want to send the DataReader itself to the page instead of calling a method to do it for you (including the relevant cleanup) by returning what is necessary? If it necessary to give the actual reader to the page, then so be it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.