Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6607979
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T19:33:40+00:00 2026-05-25T19:33:40+00:00

My orchestration has a send-receive port and until the point where the send shape

  • 0

My orchestration has a send-receive port and until the point where the send shape is found all messages being manipulated are exactly the same. I.e. the message I end up sending the Oracle db through the send-receive port are identical.

Essentially, I’m sending the db a request that states which table I would like the latest changes from and who the owner of the table is. As I mentioned, when comparing an update that worked and one that didn’t: up until this point, both request messages are the same.

The problem: The response from the db might be empty and it should never be. I’m expecting the complete row from the table that changed and sometimes I receive nothing.

Details: I’m only changing the simplest of fields to trigger these tests and always the same one – an integer field that I decrement or increment from 99 to 98 to 97 to 98… etc. One number may work the first time but not the second or sometimes it’s the opposite.

Any other field may produce this error.

More details…: It seems that Oracle’s functioning may be at fault. I.e. the way it handles timestamps may cause Oracle to return an empty record because it assumes Biztalk was already notified of a change. While looking into the innards of the db, we saw that my last change attempts were all timestamped to the same exact second (physically impossible, mind you).

It also seems like, when I’m sending Oracle a message, it does its thing twice which seems to be causing the error (no triggers on the offending table, by the way). In my orchestration I write to the eventlog right before I send the message and that message is only written once…

Seems like it might be an Oracle problem. Now the consistently working field doesn’t work and other fields work sometimes – I guess it was luck of the draw before.

Why I think this is happening: I ask it to give me the client that (the db told me) has changed and it (somehow – this is the mystery) runs its retrieval twice. The times it works, it’s the first retrieval that returns the message to Biztalk and, thus, has the actual information. When it doesn’t it’s because the second retrieval asks for the latest changes and there are none because the first retrieval already got them and so returns an empty record.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T19:33:41+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 7:33 pm

    The problem was the following:

    • Another developer had a similar orchestration set up on another server. This would send similar messages to Oracle in parallel to the orchestration that was under development.

    This is why we would only get one log message since only the orchestration I knew about had that implemented.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an orchestration in BizTalk that has a CallRules shape in it. The
another ordered delivery problem. We have an orchestration which is bound to a send
We have a BizTalk application where the order of messages being inputted is very
I have the following piece of orchestration: I send a message to a web
I have an orchestration that uses a request response port to call to a
I have an Orchestration with a Direct Bound Logical port. Lets call it O1
I tried to call a .net class through BizTalk orchestration. But when I send
I have a biztalk orchestration which which job is to catch all errors that
Good afternoon all, I've got an issue with a BizTalk orchestration that's really odd.
I have a BizTalk orchestration with an expression. The expression has the following: construct

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.