Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7050743
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:10:52+00:00 2026-05-28T03:10:52+00:00

My own reasoning for it is that there is no random access and there

  • 0

My own reasoning for it is that there is no random access and there is no way to know the bounds. But then why do we have std::advance? [EDIT] And come to think of it, why is there no std::deadvance (for lack of a better word)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:10:53+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:10 am

    You are right; the requirements for operator+/- is that it be an O(1) operation, which cannot be met by bidirectional iterators. std::advance has no such speed requirement (but will use it when available, e.g., for random access iterators).

    Note that boost has boost::next and boost::prior implementations for iterators; I’m not sure what their status is on standardization but if it’s in boost it’s solid.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I own a website and I wonder if there is a script that get
I own a video streaming website and currently I just have a simple hit
I have my own installer program which I use to install several applications I
I am creating my own carousel slideshow for images, using Jquery. Currently i have
I am writing my own Firebird database browser using the ibpp library. Is there
I have made my own exception class which derives from runtime_error and is getting
I have the following own Interface Implementation in my Fragment: @Override public void onReportChanged(Fragment
I've written my own caching layer for my objects that come out of data
We all know mutable structs are evil in general. I'm also pretty sure that
I have a root object that has a property that is a collection. For

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.