Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8898815
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T00:42:28+00:00 2026-06-15T00:42:28+00:00

My problem is that when a Task has a Task.WhenAll() call (running other Tasks)

  • 0

My problem is that when a Task has a Task.WhenAll() call (running other Tasks) the line of WhenAll() makes the consuming code continue execution, unlike what I would expect. So the following code outputs “finished” immediately when the Task.WhenAll() is hit, not after all the tasks in its argument are finished.

    // Just a simple async method
    public Task DoWorkAsync()
    {
        return Task.Factory.StartNew(
            () =>
            {
                // Working
            });
    }

    // This one used the previous one with Task.WhenAll()
    public Task DoLoadsOfWorkAsync()
    {
        return Task.Factory.StartNew(
            async () =>
            {
                // Working
                // This line makes the task return immediately
                await Task.WhenAll(DoWorkAsync(), DoWorkAsync());
                // Working
            });
    }

    // Consuming code
    await DoLoadsOfWorkAsync();
    Console.WriteLine("finished");

I’d expect the WriteLine() to be called when the last line of DoLoadsOfWorkAsync() is executed.

What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T00:42:29+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 12:42 am

    Task.WhenAll returns a new Task immediately, it does not block. The returned task will complete when all tasks passed to WhenAll have completed.

    It is an asynchronous equivalent to Task.WaitAll, and this is the method to use if you want to block.

    However you have another problem. Using Task.Factory.StartNew and passing an async delegate seems to lead to a type of Task<Task> where the outer task completes when the inner task starts to execute (rather than when it has completed).

    Using the newer Task.Run avoids this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a celery task that makes a subprocess call that can only be
I have this problem of scheduling tasks. Each task has a suggested start time
I have a problem with something that otherwise seems to be an easy task.
Here is a problem that has been bothering me a lot about Python, I
This task has already been asked/answered, but I recently had a job interview that
I have an engine that asynchronously process tasks and for one task I want
I have a item control which is bound to Tasks. Each task has task
I have an ugly data entry task that needs automation. The problem is that
Suppose that I have users, tasks and each task belongs to a batch. Each
I have a SQLite DB containing tasks. Each task has a date, and there

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.