Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 258375
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:10:31+00:00 2026-05-11T22:10:31+00:00

My project contains a large number of classes with properties whose backing field is

  • 0

My project contains a large number of classes with properties whose backing field is marked readonly as they are only set at construction. As a matter of style, I like using auto-properties as it eliminates a lot of boilerplate code and encourages use of the property member rather than the backing field. However, when using an auto-property I lose the “readonly-ness” of my backing field. I understand the compiler/runtime is able to take advantage of some performance enhancements when a field is marked this way, so I would like to be able to mark my auto-property as readonly, something like this:

[ReadOnly]
public string LastName { get; }

rather than

private readonly string _LastName;
public string LastName 
{ 
    get
    { 
        return _LastName;
    }
}

Is there some mechanism already available to do this? If not, is the performance gain from the custom backing field being readonly really worthwhile?

Exposing the field as public is another option, I suppose, it just seems wrong to expose a field that way. i.e.

public readonly string LastName;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:10:31+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:10 pm

    I’m afraid not, but you can do this:

    public string LastName { get; private set; }
    

    Not quite as good as readonly, but not too bad.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 236k
  • Answers 236k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer SELECT i.*,it.* FROM invoices i INNER JOIN ( SELECT invoice_id,… May 13, 2026 at 6:28 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer A couple of places: When you're debugging, go to Debug->Windows->Memory… May 13, 2026 at 6:28 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The lock mechanism in Subversion will not give you, out… May 13, 2026 at 6:28 am

Related Questions

I am maintaining a large MS Access Project. Over time the number of modules
This seems like a really basic thing that I'm doing, yet I'm tearing my
I have a rather large project which contains a number of third-party dependencies which
What setting(s) in a Visual Studio 2005 project could cause the build to not

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.