Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8144625
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T13:26:15+00:00 2026-06-06T13:26:15+00:00

My project has some unit tests. They all depend on some external service, over

  • 0

My project has some unit tests. They all depend on some external service, over which I have no control. This service is frequently down (recall Twitter circa 2008). Currently, if the service is down, then the tests fail, and the continuous integration server won’t build. I resent this. I’d like to ignore the tests that depend on this setup, printing a warning.

[BeforeScenario]

try
{
    connect(server)
}
catch (Exception x)
{
    throw new Exception(String.Format("Failed to connect to server {0}", server), x);
}

How can I do this? I happen to be using SpecFlow today, but I’d also like to know how to do this from NUnit.

Below is what I have currently. It’s okay. The tests are ignored, but the build still fails.

[BeforeScenario]

try
{
    connect(server)
}
catch (Exception x)
{      
    throw new SpecFlowCancelTests(String.Format("Failed to connect to server {0}", server), x);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T13:26:16+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 1:26 pm

    You can use either Assert.Inconclusive(“message”) or Assert.Ignore() utility methods:

    The Assert.Inconclusive method indicates that the test could not be
    completed with the data available. It should be used in situations
    where another run with different data might run to completion, with
    either a success or failure outcome.

    The Assert.Ignore method provides you with the ability to dynamically
    cause a test or suite to be ignored at runtime. It may be called in a
    test, setup or fixture setup method. We recommend that you use this
    only in isolated cases. The category facility is provided for more
    extensive inclusion or exclusion of tests or you may elect to simply
    divide tests run on different occasions into different assemblies.

    Useful links:
    – What is the Inconclusive Test Condition?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an ASP.NET project which has already some custom fields in it's web.config
I have to test some things on a project which has been developed by
We have an autotools project that has a mixture of unit and integration tests,
We've all been there. You have written some code and unit tests, the tests
I've a Java project which has some resources located in a folder named files
I have a Project model and it has some text attributes, one is summary.
I have created a project that uses scala that has some abstract classes definitions
Has anyone had this problem? My projects tend to have some long XML files
I'm learning NHibernate and have created some unit tests and it's going quite well.
So I have some unit tests that pass in Xcode 3.1 / Leopard. These

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.